linux-kernel - Re: [patch 55/60] x86/mm: Use INVPCID for __native_flush_tlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrVTusvLtikp13JT1LcfJ0BJxDYmv5TVzh3Pa43u_HdhxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:25:43 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirsky <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 55/60] x86/mm: Use INVPCID for __native_flush_tlb_single()

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> This uses INVPCID to shoot down individual lines of the user mapping
> instead of marking the entire user map as invalid. This
> could/might/possibly be faster.
>
> This for sure needs tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling to be redetermined;
> esp. since INVPCID is _slow_.

I'm wondering if INVPCID is *so* slow that this patch is entirely
counterproductive.

--Andy