lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171204092145.GE2255@linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:21:46 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        tglx@...utronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] arm*: disable NEON in kernel mode

On 2017-12-01 18:24:10 [+0000], Dave Martin wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/crypto/Kconfig
> > index 70c517aa4501..2a5f05b5a19a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/Kconfig
> > @@ -19,19 +19,19 @@ config CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64
> >
> >  config CRYPTO_SHA1_ARM64_CE
> >     tristate "SHA-1 digest algorithm (ARMv8 Crypto Extensions)"
> > -   depends on KERNEL_MODE_NEON
> > +   depends on KERNEL_MODE_NEON && !PREEMPT_RT_BASE
> >     select CRYPTO_HASH
> >     select CRYPTO_SHA1
> 
> Sebastian, can you piont to where sha1 (say) hits this issue?
> I wonder whether this is really a sign that some refactoring is needed.

I disabled all NEON in one go. Looking at this, it shouldn't be a issue
with the block-walk. The only thing that might be a problem is that it
can do multiple blocks in one go.

> Cheers
> ---Dave

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ