[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171204103719.7talcb3dqu3yfns2@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:37:19 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Simon Sandström <simon@...anor.nu>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux@...f-Entwicklungen.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: pi433: Rename enum optionOnOff in
rf69_enum.h
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:17:37PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Perhaps choose different function names if you want? You could do it
> as several patches:
>
> patch 1: change types to bool
> patch 2: sed -e '/ == optionOn//'
> patch 3: split the functions into two functions
> patch 4: delete optionOnOff enum
>
> patches 1 and 2 could be merged together (your choice).
>
Markus says that optionOn is used by user space so my you won't be able
to remove these entirely. But as much as possible we should internally.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists