[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABdrxx-65yZ5WURu57kUBozsL0Yu2dqNgjiirT3CW7SYQqvFpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 01:11:49 +0900
From: SeokHo Song <0xdevssh@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: set GUI mode after returning from perf_session__new()
Hi Arnaldo,
2017-12-05 0:45 GMT+09:00 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>:
> Em Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:05:18AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hi SeokHo,
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Song Seok Ho <0xdevssh@...il.com> wrote:
>> > If perf_session__new() returns NULL with use_browser set to 2 via --gtk option
>> > previously, perf dies quietly without printing any errors.
>> >
>> > The reason behind this is that GTK is not yet initialized when the caller
>> > inside perf_session__new() is trying to print error message to the screen.
>> >
>> > Reorder code to print the messages to stdio when GTK is not yet ready.
>>
>> I'm ok with this change, but it needs to consider other error messages too.
>> There are more pr_err() calls between perf_session__new() and
>> setup_browser(), so I think they have same problem.
>
> So I think I can apply this one, with Namhyung's acked-by and then Song
> can continue with followup patches?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
I've sent a follow-up patch with a new title "[PATCH v2] perf tools:
set browser mode
right before setup_browser()" with Namhyung's Acked-by added.
Addressing Namhyung's comment, I've moved the use_browser variable assignment
code below when setup_browser() is called.
Please let me know if it deserves to be in a different place.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists