linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] net: ezchip: nps_enet: Fix platform_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171204.112049.2189145622743900344.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:20:49 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com
Cc:     wg@...ndegger.com, mkl@...gutronix.de, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        opendmb@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        Vladislav.Zakharov@...opsys.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] net: ezchip: nps_enet: Fix platform_get_irq's
 error checking

From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Date: Sun,  3 Dec 2017 00:56:15 +0530

> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct. And remove unnecessary check for free_netdev().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c
> index 659f1ad..82dc6d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ezchip/nps_enet.c
> @@ -623,9 +623,9 @@ static s32 nps_enet_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	/* Get IRQ number */
>  	priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -	if (!priv->irq) {
> +	if (priv->irq <= 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to retrieve <irq Rx-Tx> value from device tree\n");
> -		err = -ENODEV;
> +		err = priv->irq ? priv->irq : -ENODEV;

If platform_get_irq() returns "zero or positive number on success" then this
test is wrong and should be "if (priv->irq < 0)"

Also, this series is a mix of different kinds of changes.

Please separate out the platform IRQ error checking and just submit exactly
those changes as a patch series.

The other bug fixes should be submitted outside of those changes since they
are unrelated.