linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] net: fjes: Handle return value of platform_get_irq and platform_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5A230C7E.4050705@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 3 Dec 2017 01:56:38 +0530
From:   arvindY <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
To:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        wg@...ndegger.com, mkl@...gutronix.de, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        opendmb@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        Vladislav.Zakharov@...opsys.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] net: fjes: Handle return value of platform_get_irq
 and platform_get_resource

Hi Sergei,

On Sunday 03 December 2017 01:36 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 12/02/2017 10:26 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>
>> platform_get_irq() and platform_get_resource() can fail here and
>> we must check its return value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c
>> index 750954b..540dd51 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c
>> @@ -1265,9 +1265,19 @@ static int fjes_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *plat_dev)
>>       adapter->interrupt_watch_enable = false;
>>         res = platform_get_resource(plat_dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> +    if (!res) {
>> +        err = -EINVAL;
>> +        goto err_free_netdev;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       hw->hw_res.start = res->start;
>>       hw->hw_res.size = resource_size(res);
>>       hw->hw_res.irq = platform_get_irq(plat_dev, 0);
>> +    if (hw->hw_res.irq <= 0) {
>
>    This function no longer returns 0 on error, no need to check for <= 0.
>
>> +        err = hw->hw_res.irq ? hw->hw_res.irq : -ENODEV;
>> +        goto err_free_netdev;
>
>    gcc allows a shorter way to write that.
>
>         err = hw->hw_res.irq ?: -ENODEV;
Yes, you are right, But first is more readable. That's why I have used.
>
>> +    }
>> +
>>       err = fjes_hw_init(&adapter->hw);
>>       if (err)
>>           goto err_free_netdev;
>
> MBR, Sergei
Thanks,
~arvind