[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171204172304.GE22431@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 19:23:04 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] pinctrl: intel: ensure error return ret is
initialized
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:08:15PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> In the (unlikely) event that community->ngpps is zero, or if every
> gpp->gpio_base is less than zero, then an ininitialized value in
> ret is returned by function intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges. Fix this by
> ensuring ret is initialized to zero. It's a moot point, but I think
> it is worthwhile ensuring this corner case is fixed.
I agree.
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462415 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
>
> Fixes: a60eac3239f0 ("pinctrl: intel: Allow custom GPIO base for pad groups")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists