[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY7maQih6iYze5BbZRsAHW+s+SENVnsbA5QenLKSbpAzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:58:53 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] pinctrl: intel: ensure error return ret is initialized
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> In the (unlikely) event that community->ngpps is zero, or if every
> gpp->gpio_base is less than zero, then an ininitialized value in
> ret is returned by function intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges. Fix this by
> ensuring ret is initialized to zero. It's a moot point, but I think
> it is worthwhile ensuring this corner case is fixed.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462415 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
>
> Fixes: a60eac3239f0 ("pinctrl: intel: Allow custom GPIO base for pad groups")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Patch applied with Mika's ACK.
Thanks for running these Coverity scans.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists