[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171204182835.GZ7829@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:28:35 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
oleg@...hat.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] workqueue: Eliminate
cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched()
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 09:06:29AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Now that cond_resched() also provides RCU quiescent states when
> > needed, it can be used in place of cond_resched_rcu_qs(). This
> > commit therefore makes this change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Applied, thank you for the review!
Thanx, Paul
> > ---
> > kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> > index 8fdb710bfdd7..aee7eaab05cb 100644
> > --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> > +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> > @@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
> > * stop_machine. At the same time, report a quiescent RCU state so
> > * the same condition doesn't freeze RCU.
> > */
> > - cond_resched_rcu_qs();
> > + cond_resched();
> >
> > spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> >
> > --
> > 2.5.2
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists