[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXUWXxQr5T6AnSDecZ6VMKpU46aBQpT3FCuuhvgpP3zhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:04:21 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@...il.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eeprom: at25: Add DT support for 25lc040
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an
>> odd number of address bits. This patch series adds support for
>> instantiating such devices from DT.
>>
>> Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in
>> include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist?
>> Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)?
>>
>> This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Geert Uytterhoeven (3):
>> eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits
>> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/
>> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values
>
> 2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind.
Thanks, I don't mind.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists