[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1512545710.16419.9.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 23:35:10 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Andrew Murray <amurray@...-data.co.uk>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: convert printk-formats.txt to rst
On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 08:11 +0100, Markus Heiser wrote:
> > Am 06.12.2017 um 02:45 schrieb Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc>:
> > Documentation/printk-formats.txt is a candidate for conversion to
> > ReStructuredText format. Some effort has already been made to do this
> > conversion even thought the suffix is currently .txt
[]
> just a question .. might it be better we stay with ASCII table
> in cases like this. I guess this table won't changed often.
> The flat-table directive is good for big and therefore frequently
> changed tables where a small precise diff reduce the patch.
> But flat-table is also hard to read in plain text. Its a balancing
> and thats my opinion, lets hear what other say ...
I think the proposed conversion is unreadable
and the original table quite clear.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists