[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0178e737-0502-d6ba-00f4-02268eca9e12@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:55:30 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Murray <amurray@...-data.co.uk>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: convert printk-formats.txt to rst
On 12/05/2017 11:35 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 08:11 +0100, Markus Heiser wrote:
>>> Am 06.12.2017 um 02:45 schrieb Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc>:
>>> Documentation/printk-formats.txt is a candidate for conversion to
>>> ReStructuredText format. Some effort has already been made to do this
>>> conversion even thought the suffix is currently .txt
> []
>> just a question .. might it be better we stay with ASCII table
>> in cases like this. I guess this table won't changed often.
>> The flat-table directive is good for big and therefore frequently
>> changed tables where a small precise diff reduce the patch.
>> But flat-table is also hard to read in plain text. Its a balancing
>> and thats my opinion, lets hear what other say ...
>
> I think the proposed conversion is unreadable
> and the original table quite clear.
Agree.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists