linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAToQjqUoA17jwvQzFzyijOP9HNGz8js3GREKTHd2NyyTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:36:45 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>
Cc:     Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Vinícius Tinti <viniciustinti@...il.com>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-12-06 6:23 GMT+09:00 Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com> wrote:
>
>>> I noticed that if I tried to make snap-pkg with the O=/some/dir option
>>> the tar step failed but the rest of the build continued, and seems to
>>> have finished successfully.  Should the snap-pkg target stop after a
>>> tar failure?
>>
>> That is weird, how did you do that?
>
> make O=/some/dir defconfig (or your-config-of-choice)
> make O=/some/dir snap-pkg
>
> The snap-pkg target is calling the src_tar command, which bails when
> $(objtree) isn't $(srctree).
>
> Is $(objtree) = $(srctree) a necessary restriction with snap builds?
> It's a restriction for rpm builds for some reason or another,

Rather, restriction for our build system.

Working directory is changed at the top Makefile if O= is given.
This option is propagated to sub-make.


> but I
> thought that was just a peculiarity of the rpm build process.  If the
> snap's tarball could be built without using src_tar, like the buildtar
> script does, then Bob's your uncle.

Probably, you must reset O=, KBUILD_OUTPUT, KBUILD_SRC, etc.
before calling rpmbuild, snapcraft, etc.

This is not a peculiarity of rpmbuild or snapcraft.

I guess things are not so simple as they look at a glance.



> Though if the source tree is an essential part of the snap build then
> perhaps the build should just exit if the tarball can't be generated
> for whatever reason, including users doing weird things :)
>

I agree, but this is not a problem specific to snap-pkg,
so Paolo's work will not be blocked.

I sent this patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10095377/



Just one question to Paolo:

  If some change like firmware removal happens in the future,
  patching for snapcraft is necessary?
    (i.e. users are required to upgrade snapcraft from --edge ?)

I guess the answer is yes, because "plugin: kernel" needs to know
the kernel-build system internal.

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada