linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2017 02:01:32 +0100
From:   "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc:     broonie@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        fabio.estevam@....com, timur@...i.org, caleb@...me.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Clean up - coding style level

On 05.12.2017 20:33, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:01:17PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> 
>>> ==Verification==
>>> Theoretically, it only needs code review, build and sanity tests. I
>>> have done build and sanity tests on an i.MX 6 platform by building
>>> using imx_v6_v7_defconfig and testing with I2S slave/master mode.
> 
>> Due to my current workload I will be able to go through this and test
>> the AC'97 mode on a UDOO board only in about a week.
> 
> This is the first round which doesn't touch program flow. If you
> prefer to verify it other than merely reviewing it, I would like
> to wait for your Tested-by. There will be another set to simplify
> all functions and their program flows after this set gets merged.
> That one will need to be fully tested.

If you can wait a week then naturally it would be better to test
these changes on a real board.

Maciej