lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:23:13 -0800
From:   Nicolin Chen <>
To:     "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Clean up - coding style level

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:01:32AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:

> >>> ==Verification==
> >>> Theoretically, it only needs code review, build and sanity tests. I
> >>> have done build and sanity tests on an i.MX 6 platform by building
> >>> using imx_v6_v7_defconfig and testing with I2S slave/master mode.
> > 
> >> Due to my current workload I will be able to go through this and test
> >> the AC'97 mode on a UDOO board only in about a week.
> > 
> > This is the first round which doesn't touch program flow. If you
> > prefer to verify it other than merely reviewing it, I would like
> > to wait for your Tested-by. There will be another set to simplify
> > all functions and their program flows after this set gets merged.
> > That one will need to be fully tested.
> If you can wait a week then naturally it would be better to test
> these changes on a real board.

I can wait for a week. I think Timur will also want to justify for
some changes. So I need time to revise and rebase as well -- I've
some patches for the 2nd set already, so rebasing would take some

Powered by blists - more mailing lists