[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171207082449.a64fr5pmasunygmf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:24:49 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/4] x86/boot/compressed/64: Introduce
place_trampoline()
* Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 07:30:48AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > But if the bootloader put the kernel above 4G (not sure if anybody does
> > > this), we would loose control as soon as paging is disabled as code
> > > becomes unreachable.
> >
> > Yeah, so instead of the double 'as' which is syntactically right but a bit
> > confusing to read, how about something like:
> >
> > But if the bootloader put the kernel above 4G (not sure if anybody does
> > this), we would loose control as soon as paging is disabled, because the
> > code becomes unreachable to the CPU.
>
> btw, it's "lose control".
Indeed!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists