[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171208110722.gl2cxdq2vlg6olih@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:07:22 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/4] x86/boot/compressed/64: Introduce
place_trampoline()
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 07:30:48AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > We also need a small stack in the trampoline to re-enable long mode via
> > long return. But stack and code can share the page just fine.
>
> BTW., I'm not sure this is necessarily a good idea: it means writable+executable
> memory, which we generally try to avoid. How complicated would it be to have them
> separate?
It's trivial: you only need to bump TRAMPOLINE_32BIT_SIZE.
But it doesn't make much sense. We're running from indentity mapping: all
memory is r/w without NX bit set (and IA32_EFER.NXE is 0).
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists