linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 3/4] x86/boot/compressed/64: Introduce place

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 12:28:42 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/4] x86/boot/compressed/64: Introduce
 place_trampoline()


* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 07:30:48AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > We also need a small stack in the trampoline to re-enable long mode via
> > > long return. But stack and code can share the page just fine.
> > 
> > BTW., I'm not sure this is necessarily a good idea: it means writable+executable 
> > memory, which we generally try to avoid. How complicated would it be to have them 
> > separate?
> 
> It's trivial: you only need to bump TRAMPOLINE_32BIT_SIZE.
> 
> But it doesn't make much sense. We're running from indentity mapping: all
> memory is r/w without NX bit set (and IA32_EFER.NXE is 0).

Ok, fair enough!

Thanks,

	Ingo