[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57c8679e-1b88-c9ad-2299-2bea7560b28f@mblankhorst.nl>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:33:14 +0100
From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@...ankhorst.nl>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3
Op 06-12-17 om 15:15 schreef Thomas Gleixner:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 06-12-17 om 13:46 schreef Thomas Gleixner:
>>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>> Op 06-12-17 om 13:15 schreef Michal Hocko:
>>>>> "No irq handler" part looks a bit scary (maybe related to lost affinity
>>>>> messages?) but the following messages look quite as well. Is this
>>>>> something known? The system seems to be up and running without any
>>>>> visible issues.
>>>> Another reproducer for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198033 ?
>>>> Symptoms are similar..
>>> Well, the spurious interrupt is one thing, but you obviously lose
>>> interrupts for some reason.
>>>
>>> Did you ever manage to get the data out which I asked for?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> tglx
>>>
>> Yes, sent this out about an hour ago
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/6/215
> Weird. Did not reach me
>
But do you have any idea?
~Maarten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists