[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712081129450.1840@nanos>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:30:52 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@...ankhorst.nl>
cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 06-12-17 om 15:15 schreef Thomas Gleixner:
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 06-12-17 om 13:46 schreef Thomas Gleixner:
> >>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >>>> Op 06-12-17 om 13:15 schreef Michal Hocko:
> >>>>> "No irq handler" part looks a bit scary (maybe related to lost affinity
> >>>>> messages?) but the following messages look quite as well. Is this
> >>>>> something known? The system seems to be up and running without any
> >>>>> visible issues.
> >>>> Another reproducer for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198033 ?
> >>>> Symptoms are similar..
> >>> Well, the spurious interrupt is one thing, but you obviously lose
> >>> interrupts for some reason.
> >>>
> >>> Did you ever manage to get the data out which I asked for?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> tglx
> >>>
> >> Yes, sent this out about an hour ago
> >>
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/6/215
> > Weird. Did not reach me
> >
> But do you have any idea?
Can you please provide the full trace, dmesg and the full output of
.../debug/irq/... ?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists