linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt: bindings: as3645a: Fix the example node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKG2TWLTREqNecy_3pOqLFJWa4SM4G4yzyKsZqW7opDvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:42:29 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt: bindings: as3645a: Fix the example node

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com> wrote:
> Rob
>
> On 12/06/2017 03:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:36:37AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Fix the address-cells and size-cells example node
>>> to reflect to the correct representation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
>>> index fdc40e354a64..8a49ccfec29b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
>>> @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ Example
>>>  =======
>>>
>>>      as3645a@30 {
>>> -            #address-cells: 1
>>> -            #size-cells: 0
>>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <0>;
>>>              reg = <0x30>;
>>>              compatible = "ams,as3645a";
>>
>> Convention is also we put compatible first.
>>
>
> OK I will move that too for v2.
>
> Can that be in the same patch or do you want a separate patch?

Same patch is fine.

Rob