linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/109] 4.9.68-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171208135842.GA3113@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:58:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/109] 4.9.68-stable review

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:05:58AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 7 December 2017 at 18:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.68 release.
> > There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat Dec  9 12:56:03 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.68-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

Really?  Any chance you all could run some graphics tests as well if you
happen to have any?  There were some big sync changes in here to resolve
some reported issues...

Anyway, if not, no big deal, thanks for the testing of these and letting
me know.

greg k-h