linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/109] 4.9.68-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:04:17 +0000
From:   Milosz Wasilewski <milosz.wasilewski@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/109] 4.9.68-stable review

On 8 December 2017 at 13:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:05:58AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 7 December 2017 at 18:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.68 release.
>> > There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Sat Dec  9 12:56:03 UTC 2017.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.68-rc1.gz
>> > or in the git tree and branch at:
>> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>>
>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
>
> Really?  Any chance you all could run some graphics tests as well if you

Based on the set of tests we've been running for some time.

> happen to have any?  There were some big sync changes in here to resolve
> some reported issues...

We'll add more tests some day (I hope). But right now, the set is
limited to what we have.

milosz

>
> Anyway, if not, no big deal, thanks for the testing of these and letting
> me know.
>
> greg k-h