[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171211012252.GA65487@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:22:53 -0800
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add
missing bits in documentation
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:58:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 09/12/2017 à 01:25, Fenghua Yu a écrit :
> > From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> >
> > With more flag bits in /proc/cpuinfo for RDT, it's better to classify the
> > bits for readability.
> >
> > Some previously missing bits are added as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > index 6851854..9b62738 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> > Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
> >
> > This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig and the
> > -X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits "rdt", "cqm", "cat_l3" and "cdp_l3".
> > +X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits:
> > +RDT (Resource Director Technology) Allocation - "rdt_a"
> > +CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) - "cat_l3", "cdp_l3", "cat_l2"
>
> Why not "Code and Data Prioritization" for cdp_l3?
CDP is an extension of CAT. So I just put cdp_l3 into the CAT class.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists