linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: ethernet: socionext: add AVE ethernet driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOFm3uF65yY3zEfTzM888z2Se24uHyoWi8iy9eBn-x_SP8=kwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:14:56 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: ethernet: socionext: add AVE
 ethernet driver

Dear Masami-san,

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
<masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org> wrote:
[...]
> Then what I'm considering is copyright notice lines. Those are usually
> treat as the header lines, not single line. So
>
>> +// SDPX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +// sni_ave.c - Socionext UniPhier AVE ethernet driver
>> +// Copyright 2014 Panasonic Corporation
>> +// Copyright 2015-2017 Socionext Inc.
>
> is acceptable? or should we keep C-style header lines for new drivers?
>
>> +// SDPX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * sni_ave.c - Socionext UniPhier AVE ethernet driver
>> + * Copyright 2014 Panasonic Corporation
>> + * Copyright 2015-2017 Socionext Inc.
>> + */
>
> I just concern that those lines are not "single". that's all. :)

My voice carries the weight of a down feather in this discussion and
to me the benefit of the first form is that you have removed two
lines. Both forms work fine.

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne