linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: ethernet: socionext: add AVE ethernet driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA93ih0C-aMpFAhU+5x6P=QjiOVRPZ0UL1wyKh1oeXzC8UjPXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:29:25 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: ethernet: socionext: add AVE
 ethernet driver

Hi Russell,

2017-12-11 22:46 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:34:17PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> IMHO, even if we use SPDX license identifier, I recommend to use
>> C-style comments as many other files do, since it is C code.
>> If SPDX identifier requires C++ style, that is SPDX parser's issue
>> and should be fixed to get it from C-style comment.
>
> See the numerous emails on this subject already.  The issue of C
> vs C++ comments has come up many times by many different people, but
> the result is the same.  That's not going to happen.  Linux kernel
> C files are required to use "//" for the SPDX identifier by order
> of Linus Torvalds.

OK, I got it.

>
> Linus has also revealed in that discussion that he has a preference
> for "//" style commenting for single comments, so it seems that the
> kernel coding style may change - but there is no desire for patches
> to "clean up" single line comments to use "//".

Thank you for making it clear.

Then what I'm considering is copyright notice lines. Those are usually
treat as the header lines, not single line. So

> +// SDPX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// sni_ave.c - Socionext UniPhier AVE ethernet driver
> +// Copyright 2014 Panasonic Corporation
> +// Copyright 2015-2017 Socionext Inc.

is acceptable? or should we keep C-style header lines for new drivers?

> +// SDPX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * sni_ave.c - Socionext UniPhier AVE ethernet driver
> + * Copyright 2014 Panasonic Corporation
> + * Copyright 2015-2017 Socionext Inc.
> + */

I just concern that those lines are not "single". that's all. :)

>
> For further information, and to see the discussion that has already
> happened, the arguments that have been made about style, see the
> threads for the patch series that tglx has been posting wrt documenting
> the SPDX stuff for the kernel.

OK, got it.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/16/663


Thanks,

>
> Thanks (let's stop rehashing the same arguments.)
>


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu