[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213212522.GC16788@promb-2n-dhcp36.eng.vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:25:23 -0800
From: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@...are.com>
To: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@...il.com>
Cc: DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
Hi Woody,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:05:50PM -0500, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> The 4.15 vmwgfx driver shows a warning during boot (32 bit x86)
> It is caused by a mismatch between the result of vmw_enable_vblank() and
> what the drm_atomic_helper expects:
> /...
> ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
> WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call
> drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
This doesn't apply to us because we don't have vblank support, and so
-ENOSYS seems to be the right error.
In the commit message for 84014b0a39ee, it does state a check for this
condition, but the check itself is based on dev->irq_enabled.
Is there another way to check for vblank support?
> /...
>
> Signed-off by: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@...il.com>
>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c 2017-11-22 15:29:46.511674079
> -0500
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c 2017-11-22 15:30:35.344559592
> -0500
> @@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@ u32 vmw_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_de
> */
> int vmw_enable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
> {
> - return -ENOSYS;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> /**
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists