linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't call sugov_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171213113435.GF30887@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:34:35 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        tkjos@...roid.com, joelaf@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't call sugov_get_util()
 unnecessarily

Hi,

On 13/12/17 15:23, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> sugov_update_shared() may get called to clear the scheduling class flags
> and we would return immediately in that case. Calling sugov_get_util()
> in that case isn't going to be of any use then. Move invocation of
> sugov_get_util() after the clear flag is checked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 7edfdc59ee8f..b69c37c867fe 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -349,8 +349,6 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>  	unsigned long util, max;
>  	unsigned int next_f;
>  
> -	sugov_get_util(&util, &max, sg_cpu->cpu);
> -
>  	raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR)) {
> @@ -358,6 +356,8 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
> +	sugov_get_util(&util, &max, sg_cpu->cpu);
> +
>  	sg_cpu->util = util;
>  	sg_cpu->max = max;
>  	sg_cpu->flags |= flags;

It seems that Patrick already posted basically the same change:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10084669/

Also, Cc-ing him for this.. I just noticed he wasn't Cc-ed to the series.

Best,

- Juri