linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't call sugov_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171213120224.GM3322@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:32:24 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        tkjos@...roid.com, joelaf@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't call sugov_get_util()
 unnecessarily

On 13-12-17, 12:34, Juri Lelli wrote:
> It seems that Patrick already posted basically the same change:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10084669/

Yeah, only that the reasoning is completely different from what he had (to which
many doubts were raised).

> Also, Cc-ing him for this.. I just noticed he wasn't Cc-ed to the series.

I copied everyone in cc from one of Patrick's email and forgot to copy the guy
in the From field :)

I have bounced all the emails to him now, he should get them.

-- 
viresh