linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/148] 4.9.69-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuQ=ENN8nwryg2Y8icS3F7OVjKzDYFQsqVh7Rb6RvgEUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:28:44 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/148] 4.9.69-stable review

On 12 December 2017 at 18:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.69 release.
> There are 148 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu Dec 14 12:43:58 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.69-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

Note:
Newly added selftests/net/reuseport_bpf FAILED in full run on x86_64 and
the independent test execution resulted as PASS.
For the internal investigation bug reported.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3502#c4

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.9.69-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.9.y
git commit: ae5cfc67087cf771ca5d1ba4da22f6ddcd960426
git describe: v4.9.68-149-gae5cfc67087c
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.68-149-gae5cfc67087c

No regressions (compared to build v4.9.68-50-gb06970f8c916)

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-------------------------------------

hi6220-hikey - arm64
* boot - pass: 20,
* kselftest - pass: 40, skip: 23
* libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60,
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 21, skip: 1
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14,
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 983, skip: 121
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,

juno-r2 - arm64
* boot - pass: 20,
* kselftest - pass: 40, skip: 23
* libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60,
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22,
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14,
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 985, skip: 121
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,

x15 - arm
* boot - pass: 20,
* kselftest - pass: 37, skip: 25
* libhugetlbfs - pass: 87, skip: 1
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60,
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 20, skip: 2
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 13, skip: 1
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 1036, skip: 66
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,

x86_64
* boot - pass: 20,
* kselftest - fail: 1, pass: 53, skip: 22
* libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 61,
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22,
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 9, skip: 1
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 957, skip: 163
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,

Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports

Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>