[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213153202.qtxnloxoc66lhsbf@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:32:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 05/16] mm: Allow special mappings with user access cleared
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:14:41AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/13/2017 04:57 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Dave, what is effect of this on protection keys?
>
> The goal was to make pkeys-protected userspace memory access
> _consistent_ with normal access. Specifically, we want a kernel to
> disallow access (or writes) to memory where userspace mapping has a pkey
> whose permissions are in conflict with the access.
>
> For instance:
>
> This will fault writing a byte to 'addr':
>
> char *addr = malloc(PAGE_SIZE);
> pkey_mprotect(addr, PAGE_SIZE, 13);
> pkey_deny_access(13);
> *addr[0] = 'f';
>
> But this will write one byte to addr successfully (if it uses the kernel
> mapping of the physical page backing 'addr'):
>
> char *addr = malloc(PAGE_SIZE);
> pkey_mprotect(addr, PAGE_SIZE, 13);
> pkey_deny_access(13);
> read(fd, addr, 1);
>
This seems confused to me; why are these two cases different?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists