linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: pinctrl: sunxi-pinctrl: fix pin funtion can not be match correctly.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171213154549.5zn4uxhsssqw3pb7@flea.lan>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:45:49 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     hao_zhang <hao5781286@...il.com>
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, wens@...e.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: pinctrl: sunxi-pinctrl: fix pin funtion can
 not be match correctly.

Hi,

Thanks for your patch!

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:47:48PM +0800, hao_zhang wrote:
> Pin function can not be match correctly when SUNXI_PIN describe with
> mutiple variant and same function.
> 
> such as:
> on pinctrl-sun4i-a10.c
> 
> SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN(B, 2),
> 		SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"),
> 		SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x1, "gpio_out"),
> 		SUNXI_FUNCTION_VARIANT(0x2, "pwm",    /* PWM0 */
> 			PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10 |
> 			PINCTRL_SUN7I_A20),
> 		SUNXI_FUNCTION_VARIANT(0x3, "pwm",    /* PWM0 */
> 			PINCTRL_SUN8I_R40)),
> 
> it would always match to the first variant function
> (PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10, PINCTRL_SUN7I_A20)
> 
> so we should add variant compare on it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: hao_zhang <hao5781286@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> index 4b6cb25..f23e74e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -83,9 +83,11 @@ sunxi_pinctrl_desc_find_function_by_name(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
>  			struct sunxi_desc_function *func = pin->functions;
>  
>  			while (func->name) {
> -				if (!strcmp(func->name, func_name))
> +				if (!strcmp(func->name, func_name)) {
> +					if (!(func->variant) ||
> +					   (func->variant & pctl->variant))

I guess it would be better to have:
	if (!strcmp(func->name, func_name) &&
	    (!func->variant || (func->variant & pctl->variant)))

Once fixed,
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)