linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuNMQ=MSjNu_GFYdGPFWRF-db3EBTmCLXJ1-akYa2Nvgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:07:39 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

On 14 December 2017 at 13:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:45:39PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 12 December 2017 at 18:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.6 release.
>> > There are 164 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Thu Dec 14 12:34:08 UTC 2017.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.6-rc1.gz
>> > or in the git tree and branch at:
>> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>>
>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64.
>> armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure issues.
>>
>> Note:
>> Newly added selftests/net/reuseport_bpf FAILED in full run on x86_64 and
>> the independent test execution resulted as PASS.
>
> That's odd, it's not good when test infrastructure doesn't work :(

Now we have results on armv7 beagleboard x15.
No regressions on armv7.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.14.6-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.14.y
git commit: 84729424b1da9e59e21c7a626d2b51970b348461
git describe: v4.14.5-165-g84729424b1da
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.14-oe/build/v4.14.5-165-g84729424b1da

No regressions (compared to build v4.14.5-97-gcdda4aaafa84)

x15 - arm
* boot - pass: 20,
* kselftest - pass: 41, skip: 20
* libhugetlbfs - pass: 87, skip: 1
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60,
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 20, skip: 2
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 13, skip: 1
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 1036, skip: 66
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,

Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports

Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>

>
> Anyway, thanks for testing and letting me know.
>
> greg k-h