linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:13:47 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

Hi Naresh,

>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64.
>> armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure issues.
>>
>> Note:
>> Newly added selftests/net/reuseport_bpf FAILED in full run on x86_64 and
>> the independent test execution resulted as PASS.

This test went in through net-next very likely. Could you please send me the
failure log for the full run.

thanks,
-- Shuah