linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:44:02 -0600
From:   Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:13:47AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
> 
> >> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> >> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64.
> >> armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure issues.
> >>
> >> Note:
> >> Newly added selftests/net/reuseport_bpf FAILED in full run on x86_64 and
> >> the independent test execution resulted as PASS.
> 
> This test went in through net-next very likely. Could you please send me the
> failure log for the full run.

Hi Shuah,

Have a look at https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3502#c7. It seems
that the problems can be seen when running reuseport_bpf as a part of
the rest of kselftest (sometimes), or when running it in a loop.

Dan