[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171215144402.jqeoelsehy5uqcc4@xps>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:44:02 -0600
From: Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:13:47AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> >> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> >> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64.
> >> armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure issues.
> >>
> >> Note:
> >> Newly added selftests/net/reuseport_bpf FAILED in full run on x86_64 and
> >> the independent test execution resulted as PASS.
>
> This test went in through net-next very likely. Could you please send me the
> failure log for the full run.
Hi Shuah,
Have a look at https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3502#c7. It seems
that the problems can be seen when running reuseport_bpf as a part of
the rest of kselftest (sometimes), or when running it in a loop.
Dan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists