linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-rbtn: Block comments use * on subsequent lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdZ=2YaSHM2BQnWjcnMjnNpVSA7EFf0iHmtmSzBP8Ur8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:56:40 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Dhaval Shah <dhaval.shah@...tnautics.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        "pali.rohar@...il.com" <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-rbtn: Block comments use * on
 subsequent lines

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dhaval Shah
<dhaval.shah@...tnautics.com> wrote:

> I got your point. SPDX text should be "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+".
> Am i Right?

Whatever you come up with I will apply taking into consideration the following:
1. Linus' preference over comment style.
2. Module author(s) blessing for the change.

Without above on the table I would not even look into the message.

P.S. And personally I'm a bit sceptical about standalone (coment)
style changes. I would rather not to apply anything like this without
real need.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko