[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171215115309.ez7odo7sh5zz7vge@oak.lan>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:53:09 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] backlight: tdo24m: add the reset line gpio
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> The Toppoly panels have a global reset line. Add an optional gpio
> control for this line, for platforms which have the ability to drive it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c b/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c
> index e4bd63e9db6b..e4b2dfabf192 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ struct tdo24m {
> struct spi_message msg;
> struct spi_transfer xfer;
> uint8_t *buf;
> + struct gpio_desc *xres;
Why do we need a write-only variable?
> int (*adj_mode)(struct tdo24m *lcd, int mode);
> int color_invert;
> @@ -364,6 +366,7 @@ static int tdo24m_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (lcd->buf == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + lcd->xres = devm_gpiod_get(&spi->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
devm_gpiod_get_optional() would be better, if only for its commenting
value.
Also, this adds a new optional property, doesn't the devicetree binding
docs need to be update to match this?
Daniel.
> m = &lcd->msg;
> x = &lcd->xfer;
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists