linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v19 3/7] xbitmap: add more operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201712180016.GHD34301.MQOLOFFJHOVFtS@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:16:33 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:     wei.w.wang@...el.com, willy@...radead.org
Cc:     virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mst@...hat.com,
        mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mawilcox@...rosoft.com, david@...hat.com, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, aarcange@...hat.com,
        amit.shah@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        liliang.opensource@...il.com, yang.zhang.wz@...il.com,
        quan.xu@...yun.com, nilal@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 3/7] xbitmap: add more operations

Wang, Wei W wrote:
> > Wei Wang wrote:
> > > > But passing GFP_NOWAIT means that we can handle allocation failure.
> > > > There is no need to use preload approach when we can handle allocation failure.
> > >
> > > I think the reason we need xb_preload is because radix tree insertion
> > > needs the memory being preallocated already (it couldn't suffer from
> > > memory failure during the process of inserting, probably because
> > > handling the failure there isn't easy, Matthew may know the backstory
> > > of
> > > this)
> > 
> > According to https://lwn.net/Articles/175432/ , I think that preloading is
> > needed only when failure to insert an item into a radix tree is a significant
> > problem.
> > That is, when failure to insert an item into a radix tree is not a problem, I
> > think that we don't need to use preloading.
> 
> It also mentions that the preload attempts to allocate sufficient memory to *guarantee* that the next radix tree insertion cannot fail.
> 
> If we check radix_tree_node_alloc(), the comments there says "this assumes that the caller has performed appropriate preallocation".

If you read what radix_tree_node_alloc() is doing, you will find that
radix_tree_node_alloc() returns NULL when memory allocation failed.

I think that "this assumes that the caller has performed appropriate preallocation"
means "The caller has to perform appropriate preallocation if the caller does not
want radix_tree_node_alloc() to return NULL".

> 
> So, I think we would get a risk of triggering some issue without preload().
> 
> > >
> > > So, I think we can handle the memory failure with xb_preload, which
> > > stops going into the radix tree APIs, but shouldn't call radix tree
> > > APIs without the related memory preallocated.
> > 
> > It seems to me that virtio-ballon case has no problem without using
> > preloading.
> 
> Why is that?
> 

Because you are saying in PATCH 4/7 that it is OK to fail xb_set_page()
due to -ENOMEM (apart from lack of ability to fallback to !use_sg path
when all xb_set_page() calls failed (i.e. no page will be handled because
there is no "1" bit in the xbitmap)).


+static inline int xb_set_page(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
+			       struct page *page,
+			       unsigned long *pfn_min,
+			       unsigned long *pfn_max)
+{
+	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
+	int ret;
+
+	*pfn_min = min(pfn, *pfn_min);
+	*pfn_max = max(pfn, *pfn_max);
+
+	do {
+		ret = xb_preload_and_set_bit(&vb->page_xb, pfn,
+					     GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	} while (unlikely(ret == -EAGAIN));
+
+	return ret;
+}

@@ -173,8 +290,15 @@ static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
 
 	while ((page = balloon_page_pop(&pages))) {
 		balloon_page_enqueue(&vb->vb_dev_info, page);
+		if (use_sg) {
+			if (xb_set_page(vb, page, &pfn_min, &pfn_max) < 0) {
+				__free_page(page);
+				continue;
+			}
+		} else {
+			set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page);
+		}
 

@@ -223,7 +354,14 @@ static unsigned leak_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
 		page = balloon_page_dequeue(vb_dev_info);
 		if (!page)
 			break;
-		set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page);
+		if (use_sg) {
+			if (xb_set_page(vb, page, &pfn_min, &pfn_max) < 0) {
+				balloon_page_enqueue(&vb->vb_dev_info, page);
+				break;
+			}
+		} else {
+			set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page);
+		}
 		list_add(&page->lru, &pages);
 		vb->num_pages -= VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE;
 	}