[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171219191222.GA6515@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:12:22 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: rao.shoaib@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
brouer@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface
for freeing rcu structures
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:52:27AM -0800, rao.shoaib@...cle.com wrote:
> This patch updates kfree_rcu to use new bulk memory free functions as they
> are more efficient. It also moves kfree_call_rcu() out of rcu related code to
> mm/slab_common.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 5 ++
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 14 ----
> kernel/sysctl.c | 40 +++++++++++
> mm/slab.h | 23 +++++++
> mm/slab_common.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
You've added an awful lot of code. Do you have any performance measurements
that shows this to be a win?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists