lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02699364973B424C83A42A84B04FDA85440BCF@JPYOKXMS113.jp.sony.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Dec 2017 01:06:25 +0000
From:   "Takiguchi, Yasunari" <Yasunari.Takiguchi@...y.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tbird20d@...il.com" <tbird20d@...il.com>,
        "frowand.list@...il.com" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "Yamamoto, Masayuki" <Masayuki.Yamamoto@...y.com>,
        "Nozawa, Hideki (STWN)" <Hideki.Nozawa@...y.com>,
        "Yonezawa, Kota" <Kota.Yonezawa@...y.com>,
        "Matsumoto, Toshihiko" <Toshihiko.Matsumoto@...y.com>,
        "Watanabe, Satoshi (SSS)" <Satoshi.C.Watanabe@...y.com>,
        "Takiguchi, Yasunari" <Yasunari.Takiguchi@...y.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 06/12] [media] cxd2880: Add integration layer for the
 driver

Hi, Mauro.

> >
> > These functions monitor the driver and watch for task completion.
> > This is part of the Sony CXD2880 DVB-T2/T tuner + demodulator driver.
> 
> If I understand well, the goal here is to have thread that would be waking
> up from time to time, right? Just use the infrastructure that the Kernel
> has for it, like a kthread, or timer_setup() & friends.
> 
> Take a look at include/linux/timer.h, and just use what's already defined.

This code is initialize process.
Therefore, it is executed only once and it will not execute other processing at the same time.
We think that the current implementation is enough.
What do you think?
furthermore, we will modify this code by using ktime_foo().

Thanks,
Takiguchi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ