[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171220085557.GA25945@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:55:57 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the
char-misc-next tree
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 01:32:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got conflicts in:
>
> drivers/Kconfig
> drivers/Makefile
>
> between commits:
>
> bbecb07fa0af ("siox: new driver framework for eckelmann SIOX")
> 3648e78ec701 ("slimbus: Add SLIMbus bus type")
>
> from the char-misc-next tree and commit:
>
> 93d3ad90c2d4 ("drivers: visorbus: move driver out of staging")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/Kconfig
> index 02b6fd0864c8,ef5fb8395d76..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/Kconfig
> @@@ -213,8 -211,6 +213,10 @@@ source "drivers/mux/Kconfig
>
> source "drivers/opp/Kconfig"
>
> +source "drivers/siox/Kconfig"
> +
> +source "drivers/slimbus/Kconfig"
> +
> + source "drivers/visorbus/Kconfig"
> +
> endmenu
> diff --cc drivers/Makefile
> index e09663776d8b,7a2330077e47..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/Makefile
> @@@ -186,4 -184,4 +186,5 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA) += fpga
> obj-$(CONFIG_FSI) += fsi/
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEE) += tee/
> obj-$(CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER) += mux/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SIOX) += siox/
> + obj-$(CONFIG_UNISYS_VISORBUS) += visorbus/
Looks good! Sorry for the conflict, I knew it was going to happen :(
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists