linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Dec 2017 10:36:15 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current
 tree

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 01:09:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   8272d099d05f ("usbip: vhci: stop printing kernel pointer addresses in messages")
> 
> from the usb.current tree and commit:
> 
>   81d8a8eb0a97 ("USB: usbip: fix spelling mistake: "synchronuously" -> "synchronously"")
> 
> from the usb tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> index 112ebb90d8c9,a9813f1d507d..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> @@@ -29,9 -30,9 +29,9 @@@ struct urb *pickup_urb_and_free_priv(st
>   		case -ENOENT:
>   			/* fall through */
>   		case -ECONNRESET:
>  -			dev_info(&urb->dev->dev,
>  -				 "urb %p was unlinked %ssynchronously.\n", urb,
>  -				 status == -ENOENT ? "" : "a");
>  +			dev_dbg(&urb->dev->dev,
> - 				 "urb seq# %u was unlinked %ssynchronuously\n",
> ++				 "urb seq# %u was unlinked %ssynchronously\n",
>  +				 seqnum, status == -ENOENT ? "" : "a");
>   			break;
>   		case -EINPROGRESS:
>   			/* no info output */

Thanks for the fixup, I'll do it when these trees converge in a week or
so.

greg k-h