lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:58:30 -0600 (CST)
From:   Christopher Lameter <>
To:     kemi <>
cc:     Michal Hocko <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
        Andrew Morton <>,
        Vlastimil Babka <>,
        Mel Gorman <>,
        Johannes Weiner <>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <>,
        Nikolay Borisov <>,
        Pavel Tatashin <>,
        David Rientjes <>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <>,
        Dave <>,
        Andi Kleen <>,
        Tim Chen <>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <>,
        Ying Huang <>,
        Aaron Lu <>, Aubrey Li <>,
        Linux MM <>,
        Linux Kernel <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mm: use node_page_state_snapshot to avoid

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017, kemi wrote:

> > You are making numastats special and I yet haven't heard any sounds
> > arguments for that. But that should be discussed in the respective
> > patch.
> >
> That is because we have much larger threshold size for NUMA counters, that means larger
> deviation. So, the number in local cpus may not be simply ignored.

Some numbers showing the effect of these changes would be helpful. You can
probably create some in kernel synthetic tests to start with which would
allow you to see any significant effects of those changes.

Then run the larger testsuites (f.e. those that Mel has published) and
benchmarks to figure out how behavior of real apps *may* change?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists