[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73938CC3E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:13:16 +0000
From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org" <virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"mhocko@...nel.org" <mhocko@...nel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mawilcox@...rosoft.com" <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"cornelia.huck@...ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"aarcange@...hat.com" <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"amit.shah@...hat.com" <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"liliang.opensource@...il.com" <liliang.opensource@...il.com>,
"yang.zhang.wz@...il.com" <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>,
"quan.xu0@...il.com" <quan.xu0@...il.com>,
"nilal@...hat.com" <nilal@...hat.com>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v20 0/7] Virtio-balloon Enhancement
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 12/19/2017 10:05 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > I think xb_find_set() has a bug in !node path.
> >
> > I think we can probably remove the "!node" path for now. It would be
> > good to get the fundamental part in first, and leave optimization to
> > come as separate patches with corresponding test cases in the future.
>
> You can't remove the !node path. You'll see !node when the highest set bit
> is less than 1024. So do something like this:
>
> unsigned long bit;
> xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
> xb_preload_end();
> bit = xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 0);
> assert(bit == 700);
This above test will result in "!node with bitmap !=NULL", and it goes to the regular "if (bitmap)" path, which finds 700.
A better test would be
...
xb_set_bit(xb, 700);
assert(xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 800) == ULONG_MAX);
...
The first try with the "if (bitmap)" path doesn't find a set bit, and the remaining tries will always result in "!node && !bitmap", which implies no set bit anymore and no need to try in this case.
So, I think we can change it to
If (!node && !bitmap)
return size;
Best,
Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists