[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171220191912.GM3875@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:19:12 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
dianders@...omium.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq
Hi,
* Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> [171219 00:50]:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:32:39AM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>
> Did this problem ever get resolved? To be clear, I believe the problem
> at hand is:
>
> (a) in suspend/resume (not runtime PM; we may not even have runtime PM
> support for most PCI devices)
It seems it should be enough to implement runtime PM in the PCI
controller. Isn't each PCI WAKE# line is wired from each PCI device
to the PCI controller?
Then the PCI controller can figure out from which PCI device the
WAKE# came from.
> Options I can think of:
> (1) implement runtime PM callbacks for all PCI devices, where we clear
> any PME status and ensure WAKE# stops asserting [1]
I don't think this is needed, it should be enough to have just
the PCI controller implement runtime PM :)
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists