[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d137ob24.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:43:48 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
Cc: <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<tiwai@...e.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: rsnd: ssi: Fix issue in dma data address assignment
Hi Jiada
Thank you for your feedback
I understand your situation
> We have enabled TDM Split and Ex-Split mode in our kernel,
> and SSI(U)'s dma address diffs based on the BUSIF it is using,
> so have a single dma data struct per rsnd_ssi will cause issue when
> SSI isn't working with BUSIF0.
First of all, "TDM (Ex) Split mode" is not yet supported.
And unfortunately, your patch is not enough for it.
I guess you enabled it with many local patches,
and posted one of them ?
It is very advanced feature, we need to consider about
channel/sampling rate/data width/settings/address etc etc etc...
Lots of things we need to solve/care !
DMA pointer is one of them.
If we focus only to DMA, your patch is still wrong I think.
"Playback/Capture direction" is not related to this topic.
1 DMA on 1 DAI is enough ?
And we need to update rsnd_gen2_dma_addr() too for DMA address.
> Do you have any suggestion to address this issue?
I have no idea at this point.
Missing part for TDM (Ex) Split mode is not only DMA pointer.
Why do you want to use it ?
If you want to do is only "use 2 DAIs for playback",
how about to use MIXer ? It is already supported on upstream.
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists