[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ajfndZ4PZgh3_DjYZBJ_TwV8ippt9e1YJTG-iWnTXHQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:30:07 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Ozgur <ozgur@...sey.org>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
andreyknvl <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] syzbot process
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Ozgur <ozgur@...sey.org> wrote:
>>> and I think syzbot use to .txt file attached.
>>> .txt is not good.
>>
>> Why are not .txt attachments good? What do you propose to use?
>
> I think I'm misunderstood that is good to have text output in a file but not useful if the file extension is ".txt"
> Not comfortable use it for mutt / vim and diff.
>
> I think needs to be an new extension, would be like this ".log" or ".syz" :)
There is an fortunate limitation in the mailing system we currently
use -- it infers Content-Type from file extension. So if we do .syz,
it will do application/octet-stream.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists