[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1014111514465704@web19o.yandex.ru>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:55:04 +0300
From: Ozgur <ozgur@...sey.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
andreyknvl <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] syzbot process
28.12.2017, 15:30, "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@...gle.com>:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Ozgur <ozgur@...sey.org> wrote:
>
>>>> and I think syzbot use to .txt file attached.
>>>> .txt is not good.
>>>
>>> Why are not .txt attachments good? What do you propose to use?
>>
>> I think I'm misunderstood that is good to have text output in a file but not useful if the file extension is ".txt"
>> Not comfortable use it for mutt / vim and diff.
>>
>> I think needs to be an new extension, would be like this ".log" or ".syz" :)
>
> There is an fortunate limitation in the mailing system we currently
> use -- it infers Content-Type from file extension. So if we do .syz,
> it will do application/octet-stream.
Hello Dmitry,
I understand and thanks for detailed info, like it!
Ozgur
Powered by blists - more mailing lists