linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix clang enum conversion warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Dec 2017 22:42:45 -0500
From:   Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, der.herr@...r.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix clang enum conversion warning

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>> Assuming that the authorship of this one-line change does not matter, as it
>> is largely suggested by the clang compiler anyway, and we want to move the
>> change forward, we should decide on which of three patches to move
>> forward. I can give my Reviewed-by and Tested-by to any of them.

I suppose Ingo would take the first and accumulate Reviewed-By tags.
I don't particularly care about authorship (please just fix the bug).

> The patch from Lukas was the first one I received, so that's the one I
> used.  I rewrote the commit msg for clarity and added my SOB and sent it
> to Ingo for merging.

I think you should have kept Nicholas Mc Guire's Reviewed by tag?
Maybe Ingo can re-add his and mine when merging?