[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171228051207.zlbdyuwwaq52ff5q@treble>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 23:12:07 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, der.herr@...r.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix clang enum conversion warning
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:42:45PM -0500, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> >> Assuming that the authorship of this one-line change does not matter, as it
> >> is largely suggested by the clang compiler anyway, and we want to move the
> >> change forward, we should decide on which of three patches to move
> >> forward. I can give my Reviewed-by and Tested-by to any of them.
>
> I suppose Ingo would take the first and accumulate Reviewed-By tags.
> I don't particularly care about authorship (please just fix the bug).
>
> > The patch from Lukas was the first one I received, so that's the one I
> > used. I rewrote the commit msg for clarity and added my SOB and sent it
> > to Ingo for merging.
>
> I think you should have kept Nicholas Mc Guire's Reviewed by tag?
> Maybe Ingo can re-add his and mine when merging?
Yes, sorry, I missed that one.
Ingo, can you please add the following?
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists